This column was published in Center for American Progress,
Getty/Chip Somodevilla--Even after the end of the government shutdown, federal
employees continue to line up outside the World Central Kitchen for free food and
coffee, January 28, 2019, in Washington, D.C.
Trump’s Shutdown Threatened the American
Dream, Especially for People of Color
By Connor Maxwell
Federal employment has long provided a pathway to the middle
class for families of color, especially African American families.
The 1960s saw a resurgence of federal employment for people
of color. The reversal of former President Woodrow Wilson’s
segregationist policies, the equal employment initiatives of the
Johnson administration, and other important victories of the civil
rights movement made holding a job with the federal government
an opportunity to move into the middle class.

These jobs provided people of color with an opportunity to serve
the country while receiving competitive pay and some measure of
protection against racial discrimination. Today, people of color
are almost 37 percent of federal executive branch employees.
While they remain underrepresented in senior positions in the
federal government, these jobs have helped countless families
build wealth and gain access to the American dream.

Shutdown jeopardized the financial security of more than 228,000 federal employees of color
President Donald Trump and Republican Senate leadership held hundreds of thousands of federal employees hostage to force taxpayers to pay
for a southern border wall that Americans do not want. The shutdown, which was the longest in U.S. history and ended on January 25, 2019—
cost the economy tens of billions of dollars and jeopardized the financial security of those who work in the service of this country. According to
new Center for American Progress analysis, more than 228,000 federal employees of color were furloughed or working without pay during the
shutdown, including approximately 2,000 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islanders; 9,000 American Indians or Alaska Natives; 9,500 people of more
than one race; 29,500 Asian Americans, 77,700 Hispanic/Latino Americans; and more than 101,000 Black/African Americans.*

The United States is facing a stark racial wealth gap, stagnant wages, and mounting inequality, while the billionaire president and his wealthy
allies tell hardworking Americans to “sacrifice.” The administration used one of the few employers providing people of color with a livable wage,
quality benefits, and savings vehicles as a bargaining chip. According to one recent analysis, the white-black wage gap is smallest in federal
employment, and black federal employees earn $10,000 more at the median than those who work for private employers or state or local
government. But the Trump administration chose to put these opportunities under threat.

During the shutdown, hundreds of thousands of federal employees were forced to either stay home or work long hours without pay. As they
struggled to make ends meet, they were told that the shutdown “is so much bigger than any one person,” and the president stated he “can
relate.” While some households rely on savings to get through emergencies, centuries of structural racism and barriers to opportunity have
resulted in African American and Latinx households having little wealth to get through tough times. In fact, in 2016, the median African American
and Hispanic households had a net worth of just $13,460 and $20,700, respectively, compared with $142,180 for white households. Much of
Americans’ wealth is also illiquid—tied up in home equity or other investments. As a result, just 36 percent and 38 percent of black and Hispanic
households, respectively, have access to $400 in case of an emergency, compared with 60 percent of white households. After missing out on
pay, these families had to choose between going hungry and allowing bills to pile up—or rely on costly payday loans or credit cards to make
ends meet. This dangerous alternative was suggested by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, who is a multimillionaire. The president has
dismissed Americans’ concerns, saying that “people that are on the receiving end will make adjustments” and indicating that he was willing to
extend his shutdown for months or even years until taxpayers give him what he wants. Fewer than 24 hours after reopening the government, the
administration threatened to shut it down again if the wall is not funded.

The president’s wall would not serve a national security purpose
President Trump has wanted to build a border wall for more than two years. But experts agree that it would serve no actual national security
purpose. For Trump, the wall is merely a campaign slogan—a talking point grounded in racism that was never a serious effort to ensure
American border security.

White nationalism and xenophobia were hallmarks of Trump’s presidential campaign—and they were effective. The campaign’s success
ensured that stoking white fear would remain a core component of Trump’s administration. As president, he continues to smear asylum seekers
and lie and misrepresent data about violent crime, terrorism, and drug and human trafficking. Now, he has taken this a step further by creating
and maintaining the longest government shutdown in U.S. history. He is even reportedly considering violating his own presidential powers by
declaring a national emergency to force taxpayers to pay for his wall if a deal is not reached in three weeks.

The shutdown is another example of the Trump administration’s efforts to undermine full participation in the American economic and social
systems. Time and time again, the administration has stripped rights, protections, and opportunities from people of color. Health care, the right
to vote, and clean air and water—all are disposable in Trump’s quest to further concentrate wealth and power in the hands of a select few. The
evidence is clear: When given the choice, the administration will always put racist and xenophobic policies, greed, and societal division above the
safety and prosperity of communities of color.

Connor Maxwell is a research associate for Race and Ethnicity Policy at the Center for American Progress.
The author would like to thank Danyelle Solomon and Saharra Griffin for their thoughtful input and contribution to this column.